Why Enlightenment enabled progress

Published on 11/8/2025 by Ron Gadd
Why Enlightenment enabled progress
Photo by Rafael Ishkhanyan on Unsplash

When reason stepped out of the ivory tower

The Enlightenment isn’t just a neat historical label; it was a cultural shift that rewired how societies thought about knowledge, authority, and the future. Before the mid‑1700s, scientific work was mostly the preserve of a handful of scholars attached to churches or royal courts. Their discoveries were impressive, but they rarely filtered down to the streets, markets, or factories where everyday life unfolded.

What changed was a collective belief that reason could be applied universally—to physics, to politics, to ethics. Think of Voltaire’s famous claim that “the best is the enemy of the good.” He wasn’t just being snarky; he was urging people to keep pushing for improvement rather than settling for tradition. That mindset sparked a cascade of practical experiments: from measuring air pressure to mapping the human circulatory system, each breakthrough was framed as a step toward a better, more predictable world.

The ripple effect was immediate. Merchants began to trust measurements rather than gut feeling, engineers started to calculate stress on bridges instead of relying on trial‑and‑error, and physicians used statistical mortality tables to gauge the effectiveness of treatments. The underlying message—progress is possible when we interrogate the world with evidence—became the engine that drove everything from the steam engine to modern public health.

The birth of modern scientific institutions

One of the most tangible legacies of the Enlightenment is the institutionalisation of science. Prior to the 1700s, universities were the main hubs of learning, but they were still heavily tethered to theological curricula. The Enlightenment ushered in a new breed of organisations: scientific societies, academies, and salons that operated on principles of peer review, open exchange, and collective funding.

  • Royal Society (London, 1660) – Although founded earlier, it flourished under Enlightenment ideals, publishing Philosophical Transactions, the first scientific journal dedicated to sharing experimental results.
  • Académie des Sciences (Paris, 1666) – Provided state‑backed resources for research, allowing figures like Lavoisier to conduct controlled chemistry experiments.
  • American Philosophical Society (Philadelphia, 1743) – Showed how the model crossed the Atlantic, fostering a network that later fed into the United States’ own scientific infrastructure.

These bodies replaced the university lecture hall as the epicentre of discovery. By standardising methods, they made it possible for a chemist in Geneva to replicate a physicist’s experiment in Copenhagen without needing a personal mentor. The competitive yet collaborative atmosphere also spurred “competing epistemologies,” as highlighted by CNRS News, where different schools of thought debated the best ways to gather and interpret data. This collective dimension turned isolated curiosity into a social engine of progress.

Ideas that rewired the economy

Enlightenment thinking didn’t stay confined to laboratories; it seeped into the very way economies were organised. The concept of utilitarianism, championed by thinkers like Jeremy Bentham, argued that policies should aim for the greatest happiness for the greatest number—a notion that translates neatly into cost‑benefit analysis, a staple of modern economics.

A few concrete examples illustrate the link:

  • Laws of supply and demand – While Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations in 1776, his ideas were built on earlier Enlightenment observations that markets function best when participants act on rational self‑interest.
  • Standardised weights and measures – The French metric system, introduced after the Revolution, emerged from Enlightenment calls for universal, rational standards. It eliminated regional “hodgepodge” units that had hampered trade.
  • Public finance reforms – Fiscal policies began to rely on empirical data rather than royal edicts. Lavoisier, for instance, helped modernise French tax collection by applying statistical methods.

These reforms reduced uncertainty, encouraging entrepreneurs to invest and innovate. When you can count on a consistent tax code, a reliable measure of distance, and a market that rewards efficiency, the whole system becomes more dynamic. The Enlightenment’s insistence on rational, evidence‑based decision‑making was, in effect, the first blueprint for the knowledge‑driven economies we see today.

From pamphlets to public debate: the new civic imagination

One of the most underrated achievements of the Enlightenment was the democratization of knowledge. The printing press had existed for centuries, but it was during the 18th century that pamphlets, journals, and encyclopaedias exploded in both number and reach. Diderot’s Encyclopédie (1751‑1772) is often cited as the era’s flagship project—a massive compendium that aimed to gather and disseminate human knowledge for anyone who could read it.

This surge in accessible information had two profound effects:

Citizen empowerment – Ordinary people could now argue about physics, law, or medicine in coffeehouses and town halls, no longer relying solely on clergy or aristocracy for guidance. Policy feedback loops – Governments began to respond to public opinion more systematically. In France, for example, the Cahiers de Doléances (1789) collected grievances from across the nation, influencing the early stages of the Revolution.

The public sphere, as described by political theorist Jürgen Habermas, became a laboratory of ideas where theories were tested against lived experience. This environment encouraged the kind of iterative progress that modern tech ecosystems emulate: propose a concept, gather feedback, refine, and repeat.

Legacy: why the Enlightenment still powers today’s progress

Fast‑forward to the 21st century, and the fingerprints of the Enlightenment are everywhere. The same rational, evidence‑based mindset fuels everything from climate‑change research to artificial‑intelligence ethics boards.

  • Open‑source software mirrors the Enlightenment ideal of shared knowledge. Developers worldwide collaborate on codebases, much like 18th‑century scientists shared data through societies.
  • Citizen science projects—think of volunteers classifying galaxies for NASA—continue the tradition of involving the public in genuine research.
  • Policy‑by‑data movements, such as evidence‑based policing or “nudge” economics, echo utilitarian principles that policies should maximize well‑being.

Even the language we use—innovation, disruption, progress—is rooted in the Enlightenment conviction that humanity can continually improve its condition through reason. While the era was far from perfect (colonialism and gender exclusion were stark realities), its core contribution—a framework for collective, rational inquiry—remains the cornerstone of modern advancement.

If we look at today’s challenges—pandemics, climate crises, digital privacy—the Enlightenment offers a reminder: systematic questioning, empirical evidence, and open debate are our most reliable tools. By embracing those principles, societies can navigate uncertainty and keep the engine of progress humming.

Sources