Why nationalism demands collective action

Published on 4/3/2026 by Ron Gadd
Why nationalism demands collective action

**Nationalism Isn’t Just a Feeling—It’s a Weapon. And You’re Being Tricked Into Wielding It.

You’ve been sold a lie. Not the kind that slithers in through backdoors—no, this one is plastered across billboards, whispered in boardrooms, and screamed from pulpits. The lie is this: nationalism is a noble sentiment, a natural instinct, a force for unity. Poppycock. Nationalism is a tool of control, a distraction from real power, and a **blueprint for collective action—just not the kind that lifts you up.

The powerful don’t want you to understand that. Because if you did, you’d see the truth: **nationalism, when harnessed by the right hands, isn’t about pride—it’s about division, extraction, and keeping you fighting each other while they loot the rest.


The Great Con: How Nationalism Turns Us Into Pawns

Let’s start with the obvious: nationalism isn’t a spontaneous outburst of patriotism. It’s a manufactured product, honed by centuries of propaganda, economic manipulation, and psychological warfare. The flags, the anthems, the “us vs.

Look at the data. Studies on nationalism as collective action reveal something disturbing: the more intense the national identity, the more likely people are to accept policies that harm them. Why? Because nationalism replaces class consciousness with tribal loyalty. It tells workers to hate immigrants instead of their bosses. It tells the poor to blame welfare recipients instead of the corporations writing their paychecks. It’s a **perfectly calibrated distraction.

And the media? Oh, they’re in on it. Research on Indigenous collective action in Canada shows how mainstream coverage **systematically frames protests as militant” or “violent> **—while ignoring the systemic violence of colonialism. Meanwhile, nationalist movements get celebrated as heroic, their grievances amplified, their demands softened. Why? Because the powerful know: **a divided people are easy to rule.


Follow the Money: Who Really Benefits When We Fight Over Flags?

Here’s the part they don’t want you to see: **nationalism is big business.

Military-industrial complex: Wars and border security mean trillions in defense contracts. Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon—they don’t care if you’re American, French, or Israeli. They care that you’re willing to die for a flag.Media conglomerates: Fox, RT, Al Jazeera, even neutral> outlets—they profit from outrage. The more you’re divided, the more you click, the more ads they sell. — Elite class protection: Nationalism distracts from wealth inequality. When you’re busy hating the other, > you’re not asking why your CEO makes 300 times your salary. — Real estate and gentrification: Save our neighborhoods!” is code for > keep out the poor, the Black, the brown, the queer. Nationalism sanitizes displacement.

The real question isn’t > Why are people nationalist? It’s **> Who benefits when we are?


The Lie of “Individualism> : Why Nationalism Demands Collective Action (But Not the Kind You Think)

Here’s where the scam gets really ugly.

The ruling class will tell you: **Pull yourself up by your bootstraps. Don’t rely on the government. Be self-sufficient.> ** But nationalism? It’s the ultimate collective action—just not for you. It’s about **mobilizing millions to fight for a cause that only the powerful control.

Fascism wasn’t built by lone wolves. It was built by organized marches, propaganda campaigns, and state-backed violence.Brexit wasn’t a grassroots rebellion. It was a corporate coup, with hedge funds betting on chaos while workers got screwed. — The January 6 insurrection? A staged spectacle to justify crackdowns on real dissent.

Nationalism demands collective action—just not the kind that challenges power. It demands marches for borders, not marches for healthcare. It demands protests against globalists, > not protests against your landlord. It demands **loyalty to a flag, not to your fellow workers.

And here’s the kicker: You’re being gaslit into thinking you’re the problem. *Too much nationalism is dangerous!> * they say. But the real danger isn’t nationalism—it’s the fact that it’s the only game in town. Because when the system fails you, what’s left? Not solidarity. Not mutual aid. **Nationalism.


What They Don’t Want You to Know: The Real History of Nationalism as a Tool of Oppression

Let’s talk about **who nationalism really serves.

— **Colonialism wasn’t about spreading civilization.> ** It was about extracting resources and labor. Nationalism was the justification. — **The Holocaust didn’t happen because Germans were brainwashed.> ** It happened because elites weaponized nationalism to dehumanize Jews, Roma, and dissidents.Apartheid wasn’t a moral failure—it was a business model. And nationalism kept Black South Africans fighting each other while the white elite banked.

Nationalism isn’t a spontaneous emotion. It’s a calculated strategy. And the people who benefit most? **The ones who control the narrative.


The Only Collective Action That Matters: Smashing the System, Not the Scapegoat

So what’s the alternative? **Real collective action.

Strikes that shut down cities, not borders.Protests that demand healthcare, not deportations.Solidarity that crosses lines, not walls.

Nationalism tells you: You’re powerless. The only way to matter is to hate the other.” But history shows the opposite. The civil rights movement, the labor rights movement, the climate justice movement—these weren’t built on nationalism. They were built on **people refusing to be divided.

The powerful want you to believe that change comes from the top. That leaders will save you. That you need a strongman to fix things. Bullshit. The only thing that’s ever fixed anything is **people refusing to accept their lot and organizing.

So here’s the choice:

  • Do you keep marching for a flag? — **Or do you start marching for your life?

The answer should be obvious.


Sources

The piece synthesizes findings from:

  • Had, The consequences of nationalism: A scholarly exchange (2023, Nations and Nationalism) — ERIC, Nationalism and Media Coverage of Indigenous People's Collective Action in Canada (2010, American Indian Culture and Research Journal) — Annual Reviews, Nationalism: What We Know and What We Still Need to Know (2020)

Additional context drawn from historical and sociological research on nationalism as a tool of statecraft and economic control.

Sources

The consequences of nationalism: A scholarly exchange — Had — 2023 — Nations and Nationalism — Wiley Online LibraryERIC — EJ913001 — Nationalism and Media Coverage of Indigenous People's Collective Action in Canada, American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 2010Nationalism: What We Know and What We Still Need to Know

Comments

Leave a Comment
Your email will not be published. Your email will be associated with your chosen name. You must use the same name for all future comments from this email.
0/5000 characters
Loading comments...